Skip to main content
Enterprise Agile Planning icon with arrows

This post is from the CollabNet VersionOne blog and has not been updated since the original publish date.

Last Updated Feb 12, 2013 — Enterprise Agile Planning expert

Java Web Apps to Rails, A Developer’s Experience…

Enterprise Agile Planning

After transitioning from Java to Rails, I realized this may be a topic worth exploring within the CloudForge community.  This blog delves into my experience of switching from building Java/Flex applications to building Rails applications.   Let me share a little bit of history to help set the tone of this blog.  I have worked in procedural and OO languages (C/C++, Perl, Java) building web applications.  This is my first time developing on a Mac (not to mention, even a right click without a mouse was a mystery when I started).  So, the transition is not just to Rails, but to Rails using a Mac interface.

The goal of this blog is to compare:  developer start-up time, developer tools, Java & Ruby languages, and Web frameworks.

Developer start up time:

The last two Java web applications I worked on were huge code stacks with Flex UI and an Oracle database.  It took a week to get these applications to run, tweak and break because the setup process required me to install a plethora of tools:  version control, application servers, language packages, databases, and version management systems.

On the contrary, Rails comes pre-packaged with some of the tools mentioned above which reduced my setup time significantly.  It took less than a day on a developer Mac and one day on a brand new Mac.

Developer Tools:

When it was time to look at the code, I was a bit disappointed.  TextMate looked like a popular choice but it fell short in many ways.  I struggled to navigate the code, link the methods across files and follow the code. Grep was my only savior. Some of these might take getting used to, but I did not find anything in the menu that could help. Maybe I am biased, but I miss the intuitive Eclipse IDE and the debugging comfort that allowed me to understand the code better and quicker.
The other developer tools such as database viewer, testing frameworks, and command line interface were pretty much the same, no surprises.


My approach to learning Ruby was to start looking at code and figuring out pieces of syntax that did not make sense.  That turned out to be a bad idea. Constructs like “do |x| x+1” threw me off. It certainly helps when switching languages to map constructs.  However, mapping should only be the initial step to get acquainted.  I found it very important to understand the motivation behind creating the new language.  In the case of Ruby, the reasons I see are to reduce inconsistencies, to minimize verbosity (abstracting/hiding boiler plate code), to simplify complex operations. and to reduce programmer errors.

For example, Java has a concept of primitive data types.  Integer and int co-exist in the language and programmers need to make sure Object versions of these data types are used in the appropriate places.  The language does have warnings/errors in place to help the programmer.  However, a developer should be aware of these aspects.  Ruby eliminates that need since everything in Ruby is an Object including nulls.  Blocks in Ruby simplify iterating and modifying collections among other things.  There is significantly less code to maintain, notably code for parsing files, and code for getter/setter methods.

However, I miss parameters list, curly braces, return statements, camel case naming conventions and one way to declare variables (as opposed to the multiple symbols :, @ in Ruby) that make Java code readable.  The concept of ‘open classes’ that allow developers to go in and change a base class sounds scary.  This means the class I write might operate very differently at a later point and the only way to track it down is by looking at the files history.  It is possible in Java too, but I feel the language protects against it more than Ruby does.


Frameworks for web applications are probably not too different.  Since the purpose of the framework is same across languages and platforms, the main pieces are similar.  The differences I see are in the amount of automation the frameworks offer.  It helps to start with what makes a web application and what tools a developer needs to get things running.  A web application needs front end/UI code, server code, a web archive of deployed code, application server where the application lives, databases for persisting data, testing framework, a continuous integration system to test, build and deploy code.  Here is my mapping of Java Web application to a Rails app.

ConceptJava TechnologiesRails
FrontendJSP, FlexViews folder (ERB)
BackendJ2EE (src/main/java)Ruby (Model, Controller folders)
Application ServerTomcatBrick
DatabaseOracle/MySQL/..any otherSame as J2EE
Testing FrameworkJunitRspec
Mock TestingEasyMock, DBunitFactory Girl, Relish
Build ManagementMaven, AntRVM
URL MappingWeb.xmlRouting.rb

In conclusion, Ruby is much more flexible and Rails is a bit more restricted than I am used to.  The restrictions are part of the Convention over Configuration idea.  I need to get use to its various ways and unlearn a lot of Java habits.

How has your transition been? I’d love to know so please share your experiences by entering it in the comment section below.


More from the Blog

View more Government Cloud
Apr 12, 2022 Government Cloud receives FedRAMP Authorization through sponsorship from the United States Department of Veterans Affairs

Enterprise Agile Planning
Flagship Agility solutions can effectively scale agile deve ...
Read More
Nov 22, 2021

What are the qualities of highly effective agile teams?

Enterprise Agile Planning
A team is the core unit of productivity in an agile organization. Wher ...
Read More
Nov 15, 2021

How an open-first attitude revolutionized government tech development

Enterprise Agile Planning
Public perception of government is often that it is slow-moving, reluc ...
Read More
cross functional
Nov 08, 2021

6 best practices for building resilient cross-functional teams

Enterprise Agile Planning
Agile frameworks prize the quality of resilience within every facet of ...
Read More
Contact Us